Acetaminophen Use During Pregnancy & Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Comprehensive Scientific Review

Acetaminophen Use During Pregnancy & Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Comprehensive Scientific Review

Introduction

Recent policy announcements and scientific publications have renewed attention on the potential association between acetaminophen (also known as paracetamol or by brand names like Tylenol) use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders in children, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In September 2025, the Trump Administration issued new health guidance highlighting concerns about acetaminophen use during pregnancy, with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stating there is “mounting evidence finding a connection between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and autism.” This article examines the current scientific evidence to provide healthcare providers and expecting parents with a clear understanding of what the research shows.

Current Autism Statistics in the United States

Understanding the scope of autism spectrum disorder provides crucial context for evaluating research on potential contributing factors. According to the latest autism statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network, autism now affects 1 in 31 eight-year-old children in the United States as of 2025, representing a significant increase from 1 in 36 children in 2020 and 1 in 44 children in 2018.

Demographic Patterns

The current autism landscape shows distinct demographic patterns that are important for understanding research findings:

Gender Disparities: Boys continue to be diagnosed with autism at significantly higher rates, with approximately 5.1% of boys affected compared to 1.6% of girls, maintaining the historical 3.2:1 male-to-female ratio.

Racial and Ethnic Trends: For the first time, minority children are showing higher autism prevalence rates than white children:

  • Asian/Pacific Islander children: 3.82% (1 in 26)
  • Black children: 3.66% (1 in 27)
  • Hispanic children: 3.30% (1 in 30)
  • White children: 2.77% (1 in 36)

Geographic Variation: Autism prevalence varies substantially across communities, ranging from 4.5% in California to 2.3% in Maryland, likely reflecting differences in diagnostic practices and healthcare access rather than true regional variations in autism occurrence.

Economic and Social Impact

The total annual economic impact of autism in the United States reached $126 billion in 2025, with an average annual cost of $28,000 per person and lifetime costs estimated at $1.4 million. These statistics underscore the importance of identifying modifiable risk factors that could potentially reduce autism incidence, making research into prenatal exposures particularly relevant from both scientific and public health perspectives.

Recent Research Developments (2024-2025)

NIH-Funded Research and Institutional Support

In May 2025, the National Institutes of Health highlighted research suggesting acetaminophen exposure in pregnancy is linked to higher risk of ADHD and autism. The NIH noted that these findings “support earlier studies linking acetaminophen exposure in the womb with ADHD and ASD and underscore the need for additional research.”

Mount Sinai’s 2025 Comprehensive Analysis

According to Dr. Diddier Prada, Assistant Professor at Mount Sinai, “Our findings show that higher-quality studies are more likely to show a link between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and increased risks of autism and ADHD.” The research team noted that acetaminophen is known to cross the placental barrier and may trigger oxidative stress, disrupt hormones, and cause epigenetic changes that interfere with fetal brain development.

Navigation Guide Methodology Findings

The comprehensive Environmental Health review using Navigation Guide methodology found that “numerous well-designed studies have indicated that pregnant mothers exposed to acetaminophen have children diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), including autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), at higher rates than children of pregnant mothers not exposed.” Meta-analysis results indicated prenatal exposure to acetaminophen is associated with an increased risk of both ADHD (pooled relative risk: 1.34) and ASD (pooled relative risk: 1.19), with stronger associations linked to longer duration of exposure.

Contrasting Perspectives from Recent Research

However, recent high-quality research published in 2025 concluded that “according to the current scientific evidence, in utero exposure to acetaminophen is unlikely to confer a clinically important increased risk of childhood ADHD or ASD. The current level of evidence does not warrant changes to clinical guidelines on the treatment of fever or pain in pregnancy.” This research found that “acetaminophen use during pregnancy was not associated with children’s risk of autism, ADHD, or intellectual disability in sibling control analysis,” suggesting “associations observed in other models may have been attributable to familial confounding”.

The relationship between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes has been studied extensively over the past decade, but the research presents a complex and sometimes contradictory picture.

Studies Suggesting a Potential Association

A comprehensive review published in August 2025 in Environmental Health used the Navigation Guide methodology to analyze 46 studies on prenatal acetaminophen exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders. This systematic analysis found that “27 studies reported positive associations (significant links to NDDs), 9 showed null associations (no significant link), and 4 indicated negative associations (protective effects)”.

The Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health has published research indicating potential concerns. According to Harvard’s Dean of the Faculty, Andrea Baccarelli, “We found evidence of an association between exposure to acetaminophen during pregnancy and increased incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders in children”. This rigorous review was funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and contributes to the growing body of research examining this potential relationship.

Several major academic institutions have published studies supporting these concerns:

Nurses’ Health Study II: This large-scale cohort study reported associations between in utero acetaminophen exposure and later diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder and ADHD.

Boston Birth Cohort: Another significant cohort study that found similar associations between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Johns Hopkins University: Research from Johns Hopkins found that taking Tylenol during pregnancy was associated with elevated risks for autism and ADHD.

Mount Sinai: A 2025 study from Mount Sinai supported evidence that prenatal acetaminophen use may be linked to increased risk of autism and ADHD.

Studies have identified several biological mechanisms that could potentially explain these associations, including acetaminophen’s effects on oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, and alterations in prostaglandin and endocannabinoid pathways that are involved in prenatal neuronal development. Scientists have proposed specific biological mechanisms linking prenatal acetaminophen exposure to altered brain development and adverse birth outcomes.

International Consensus Statement (2021): An international consensus statement highlighted “a call for precautionary action,” recommending that pregnant women “minimize exposure” to acetaminophen “by using the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible time.”

Studies Finding No Causal Relationship

However, some of the most methodologically rigorous research challenges these findings. A large-scale Swedish study published in JAMA in 2024, which followed nearly 2.5 million children, concluded that “acetaminophen use during pregnancy was not associated with children’s risk of autism, ADHD, or intellectual disability in sibling control analysis”.

This study used a sophisticated sibling-control design to account for genetic and environmental factors shared within families. The researchers found that while preliminary models showed small associations, these disappeared when comparing siblings within the same family, suggesting “associations observed in other models may have been attributable to familial confounding”.

Understanding the Research Methodologies

The conflicting findings largely stem from different research approaches:

Population-Based Studies

Most studies showing associations use population-based comparisons, which can be affected by confounding factors – other variables that influence both acetaminophen use and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Sibling-Control Studies

Sibling-control studies compare children within the same family whose mothers used different amounts of acetaminophen during different pregnancies. This approach helps control for shared genetic and environmental factors. However, these studies have limitations including reduced statistical power and potential issues with exposure measurement.

Exposure Assessment Challenges

A significant limitation in some research is exposure misclassification. For example, one Swedish study reported only 7.5% acetaminophen usage among pregnant individuals, in stark contrast to the approximately 50% reported globally, suggesting substantial underreporting.

Key Scientific Findings

What Recent High-Quality Studies Show

  1. Large-Scale Swedish Cohort (2024): Following 2.48 million children, this study found no associations in sibling-controlled analyses, with hazard ratios near 1.0 for autism (0.98), ADHD (0.98), and intellectual disability (1.01).
  2. Harvard Navigation Guide Review (2025): This comprehensive review concluded there was “strong evidence of an association between prenatal acetaminophen use and increased NDD incidence” but acknowledged the limitations of observational studies.

Enhanced Biological Mechanisms Research

Recent research has expanded understanding of the potential biological pathways through which acetaminophen could theoretically affect fetal development:

Placental Barrier and Metabolism: Acetaminophen readily crosses the placental barrier, achieving similar concentrations in fetal and maternal plasma. Critically, the main pathways for acetaminophen metabolism are not active in the fetus until mid-gestation, potentially leading to prolonged exposure to the parent compound and its metabolites.

Oxidative Stress Amplification: The acetaminophen-induced oxidative stress is amplified during fetal life because of the limited fetal antioxidant capacity. This oxidative stress can occur during critical periods of brain development when neural circuits are being established.

Epigenetic Changes: Recent research has identified that acetaminophen exposure may cause epigenetic changes that interfere with fetal brain development, potentially altering gene expression patterns crucial for normal neurodevelopment.

Sex-Specific Endocrine Disruption: Studies have documented sex-specific endocrine-disruptive effects of acetaminophen, which may explain some of the gender disparities observed in autism and ADHD diagnoses.

Inflammatory and Immunologic Pathways: Prenatal exposure to acetaminophen may result in compromised neurodevelopment through inflammatory and immunologic mechanisms that can affect brain development during critical windows.

Multiple Pathway Interactions: The drug affects prostaglandin synthesis, endogenous cannabinoid systems, and other neurochemical pathways simultaneously, creating a complex web of potential developmental disruptions.

Detailed Study Analysis

Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa)

This longitudinal study followed over 100,000 pregnancies and found associations between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and increased risk of ADHD symptoms. The study controlled for multiple confounding factors including maternal mental health, smoking, and socioeconomic status. However, residual confounding remained a concern as mothers who use acetaminophen may differ systematically from those who don’t.

Danish National Birth Cohort

A large Danish study of 64,322 live births found that prenatal acetaminophen exposure was associated with hyperkinetic disorder and ADHD-like behaviors. The study showed dose-response relationships, with longer exposure periods associated with higher risks. However, the study relied on maternal recall of medication use, potentially introducing recall bias.

Barcelona Birth Cohort (INMA Project)

This European multi-center study examined 2,644 mother-child pairs and found associations between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and impaired cognitive function and increased behavioral problems in children at age 5. The study used validated neuropsychological tests but had limitations in exposure assessment timing.

Meta-Analyses Findings

Multiple meta-analyses have attempted to synthesize the evidence:

  • A 2019 meta-analysis of 132,738 mother-child pairs found significant associations with ADHD (RR: 1.34) and autism spectrum disorders (RR: 1.19)
  • However, these meta-analyses primarily included observational studies susceptible to confounding

Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Evidence

Placental Transfer and Fetal Metabolism

Acetaminophen readily crosses the placental barrier, achieving fetal plasma concentrations similar to maternal levels within 30 minutes of administration. The fetal liver has limited capacity for glucuronidation, the primary detoxification pathway, potentially leading to prolonged exposure to the parent compound and its metabolites.

Oxidative Stress Mechanisms

Acetaminophen metabolism produces reactive metabolites that can deplete glutathione stores and increase oxidative stress. The developing fetal brain has limited antioxidant capacity, making it potentially vulnerable to oxidative damage during critical developmental windows.

Endocrine Disruption

Research has shown that acetaminophen can interfere with sex hormone production and androgen signaling pathways. Animal studies demonstrate that prenatal acetaminophen exposure can reduce testosterone production and disrupt normal sexual differentiation of the brain, which may be relevant to neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Prostaglandin and Endocannabinoid Systems

Acetaminophen affects prostaglandin synthesis and may interact with endocannabinoid pathways. These systems play crucial roles in early brain development, neuronal migration, and synapse formation. Disruption during critical periods could theoretically affect neurodevelopmental trajectories.

Exposure Timing and Critical Windows

First Trimester Exposures

Some studies suggest that first-trimester exposure may be particularly concerning, as this period involves crucial processes of neural tube formation and early brain development. However, the evidence for trimester-specific effects is inconsistent across studies.

Duration and Dose Relationships

Several studies have reported dose-response relationships, with longer duration of use and higher cumulative doses associated with increased risks. However, these relationships are not consistently observed across all studies and populations.

Frequency of Use Patterns

Research indicates that occasional use (1-2 times) shows weaker associations compared to regular or frequent use throughout pregnancy. This pattern supports a potential dose-response relationship but could also reflect confounding by indication.

Policy Context and Current Guidance

Trump Administration Position (September 2025)

The Trump Administration has taken a strong position on this issue, with President Trump announcing “major progress in understanding the root causes of autism” and unveiling new initiatives to tackle what officials term “the autism epidemic.” The Administration’s position emphasizes that evidence suggests acetaminophen use in pregnant women, especially late in pregnancy, may cause long-term neurological effects in their children.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated: “The Trump Administration does not believe popping more pills is always the answer for better health. There is mounting evidence finding a connection between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and autism — and that’s why the Administration is courageously issuing this new health guidance.”

Regulatory Context

Current Medical Consensus

Acetaminophen remains the recommended pain and fever medication during pregnancy because:

  1. Established Safety Profile: Decades of use have established its relative safety compared to alternatives
  2. NSAID Risks: Other pain medications like ibuprofen carry known risks during pregnancy, particularly in later trimesters
  3. Untreated Conditions: Untreated maternal fever and pain pose established risks including neural tube defects and preterm birth

Regulatory Context

  • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration continues to consider acetaminophen minimally risky during pregnancy
  • The European Medicines Agency maintains similar guidance
  • However, a 2021 international consensus statement recommended that pregnant individuals “minimize exposure” to acetaminophen
  • The Trump Administration’s September 2025 guidance represents a significant policy shift, recommending heightened caution regarding acetaminophen use during pregnancy

Global Usage Patterns and Exposure Assessment

Worldwide Acetaminophen Use During Pregnancy

Acetaminophen is one of the most commonly used medications during pregnancy globally, with approximately 50-70% of pregnant women using it at some point during gestation. This widespread usage makes understanding its safety profile critically important for public health.

Exposure Measurement Challenges in Research

A significant methodological concern in acetaminophen research is exposure misclassification. Studies have found substantial variations in self-reported usage rates:

  • Some European studies report acetaminophen usage rates as low as 7.5% among pregnant women
  • North American studies typically report usage rates of 50-65%
  • These disparities suggest significant underreporting in some populations, potentially due to cultural differences, recall bias, or varying access to over-the-counter medications

Biomarker Studies and Objective Measurement

Recent research has begun using biomarker measurements rather than self-reported data to assess exposure. Studies comparing self-reported intake with maternal and newborn biomarker measures have revealed:

  • Significant discrepancies between reported and measured acetaminophen exposure
  • Evidence that many women may not recall or report occasional acetaminophen use
  • Biomarker studies generally show higher actual exposure rates than self-reported studies

Alternative Pain Management During Pregnancy

Non-Pharmacological Approaches

Given the ongoing research into acetaminophen safety, increased attention is being paid to alternative pain management strategies during pregnancy:

Physical Therapies:

  • Prenatal massage therapy
  • Chiropractic care specialized for pregnancy
  • Acupuncture (when performed by qualified practitioners)
  • Physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain

Lifestyle Modifications:

  • Heat and cold therapy applications
  • Gentle prenatal exercise and stretching
  • Sleep position optimization
  • Stress reduction techniques

Complementary Approaches:

  • Meditation and relaxation techniques
  • Prenatal yoga
  • Support garments for back and pelvic pain
  • Dietary modifications for certain types of pain

When Medication May Be Necessary

Healthcare providers emphasize that certain conditions during pregnancy require medical intervention:

  • High fever (which poses risks to fetal development)
  • Severe pain that interferes with sleep or daily functioning
  • Chronic conditions requiring ongoing pain management
  • Situations where untreated pain could lead to complications

Risk Communication and Patient Counseling

Absolute vs. Relative Risk Perspective

When research does suggest associations, it’s important to understand the actual magnitude of risk:

  • Even in studies showing positive associations, the absolute risk increase is typically small
  • For example, one large study suggested the risk of child autism at 10 years of age is 0.09% higher with acetaminophen use compared to no use
  • These small absolute increases, while potentially concerning from a population health perspective, represent minimal individual risk

Individualized Decision Making

Healthcare providers are increasingly emphasizing individualized risk-benefit assessments that consider:

  • The specific medical indication for pain relief
  • Maternal health conditions and pregnancy complications
  • Alternative treatment options and their feasibility
  • Patient preferences and concerns
  • Duration and dosing considerations

For Healthcare Providers

  1. Individual Assessment: Each case requires weighing the specific medical need against potential risks
  2. Lowest Effective Dose: When acetaminophen is medically indicated, use the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration
  3. Alternative Approaches: Consider non-pharmacological pain and fever management when appropriate

For Expecting Parents

  1. Don’t Panic: The absolute risk increases suggested by studies showing associations are very small
  2. Medical Guidance: Always consult with healthcare providers about pain and fever management during pregnancy
  3. Balanced Perspective: Consider that untreated fever and severe pain also pose risks to pregnancy

Media Coverage and Public Response

Scientific Communication Challenges

The acetaminophen-autism research has generated significant media attention, leading to varied public responses. As noted in recent policy discussions, there has been concern about “frenzied hyperventilation” and potential misrepresentation of the scientific evidence in some media coverage.

Healthcare Provider Perspectives

Many healthcare providers have expressed concern about balanced communication, noting that:

  • Untreated fever and pain during pregnancy pose established risks
  • Complete avoidance of pain medication may not be medically appropriate in all cases
  • The research remains observational and has significant methodological limitations
  • Clinical guidelines have not changed based on current evidence levels

Patient Anxiety and Decision-Making

The research has created anxiety among pregnant women and those planning pregnancy, leading to:

  • Increased requests for alternative pain management options
  • Concerns about past acetaminophen use during pregnancy
  • Confusion about balancing theoretical risks with immediate medical needs

International Regulatory Responses

European Medicines Agency Position

The European Medicines Agency has maintained its guidance while acknowledging ongoing research, stating that acetaminophen remains the preferred analgesic during pregnancy when medication is necessary.

Other National Health Authorities

Various national health authorities have issued statements:

  • Most maintain existing guidance while recommending judicious use
  • Some have updated patient information leaflets to include recent research findings
  • Emphasis remains on using the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration

Consensus Statements Evolution

The 2021 international consensus statement calling for “precautionary action” represented a shift toward more conservative recommendations, even in the absence of definitive causal evidence. This consensus involved researchers from multiple countries and represents ongoing scientific debate about interpreting observational evidence.

What the Current Evidence Shows

Based on the totality of research through 2025:

  1. Conflicting High-Quality Evidence: The highest-quality sibling-control studies have not established a causal relationship, while systematic reviews of observational studies suggest associations
  2. Biological Plausibility: Multiple credible mechanisms exist by which acetaminophen could theoretically affect fetal brain development, including oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, and epigenetic changes
  3. Methodological Challenges: Exposure assessment difficulties, confounding by indication, and familial confounding limit the interpretability of observational studies
  4. Policy Divergence: Regulatory agencies maintain existing guidance while some policymakers advocate for stronger precautionary approaches
  5. Small Absolute Risk: Even studies showing associations suggest very small increases in absolute risk at the individual level
  6. Research Evolution: The field continues to evolve with improved methodologies, biomarker studies, and larger datasets

Scientific Limitations and Future Research

Current Study Limitations

  1. Confounding by Indication: The conditions for which acetaminophen is taken (fever, infection, chronic illness) may themselves be risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders
  2. Exposure Measurement: Most studies rely on self-reported medication use, which can be inaccurate
  3. Diagnostic Challenges: Neurodevelopmental disorders have complex, multifactorial causes that are difficult to isolate

Research Needs

Future studies should focus on:

  • Better exposure assessment methods
  • Larger sibling-control studies
  • Investigation of critical exposure windows
  • Development of safer alternatives when needed

This article is based on peer-reviewed scientific literature and represents the current state of knowledge as of September 2025. As research in this area continues to evolve, recommendations may be updated based on new evidence.

📩Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get must-read Data Reports, Global Insights, and Trend Analysis — delivered directly to your inbox.